|
**Ref. 1
As we can see, chromium
is the most effective pearlite promoter (6-7 times more effective than
copper or nickel). It is also a strong carbide former and stabilizer in
the flame hardening time. The flame-hardened gray iron typically has a
lower hardness than the metal immediately below the surface due to the
retention of austenite at surface (ref. 1)
Mo and Mn are the
recognized elements for increasing the hardenability of gray iron (the
Jominy
curve is shifted to
larger distances from the quenched end). It is advisable that Mn be held
at 0.8 to 1.0%
to increase carbon
solubility in austenite.
Ni increases the
hardenability, impact load resistance, elasticity modulus and decreases
the temperature of the transformation points.
Cu decreases the impact
resistance and it has a much lower contribution in improving the
hardenability and elasticity modulus.
Both, Ni and Cu, are
weaker hardeners and do not affect the hardenability nearly as much.
These elements tend to segregate during solidification (ref. 2) and to
form a "sticky" surface with nonuniform hardness distribution. Also,
they do not increase the hardness of the first 0.020-0.040" below the
surface which are the most important in a sliding wear application (fig.
1, ref. 3) and in concentrations over 1.0% they tend to retard nitrogen
diffusion.
In cast irons,
aluminum is a graphitizer and it can be found as an "impurity"
originating from the
ferro-silicon added
to the melt. Like Cr, because of its high affinity for nitrogen,
aluminum is responsible for the increase in surface hardness after
nitriding at values over 1100 HV (ref. 1, 4).
The hardenability is
particularly of importance for relatively small heat treated parts where
the bulk
properties are
important and adequate cooling rates may be obtained. For large
automotive dies, weighing several thousand pounds, where the bulk
properties are not achievable because of their sizes, surface
treatments, such as flame hardening, ionitriding or chrome plating, are
used to improve the sliding wear resistance and hardness of the surface.
The consideration of
residual stress is divided into two major orders:
-
the First-Order
Stress is defined as macro or long range residual stress acting over
large regions and phases in the polyphase materials. It represents
over 90% of the total stress which can be found in stressed bodies.
-
the Second-Order
Stress can be defined as micro, short-range or texture stress across
one grain or part of one grain of the material (thermo-mechanical
induced lattice defects, precipitates,.. .). It represents less than
10% of the total stress and it is usually ignored when designing
mechanical parts (ref. 5).
By heating the iron
(at a rate not higher than 150 to 200°F per hour), the stress (from both
classes) is
relieved by rapid
creep. Very large shapes and complex machined parts should be cooled
uniform into the furnace even under
200°F,
so that stress is
not reintroduced.
Stress relieving by
vibrations has been promoted in the market, as a method for providing
stress
relief to iron
castings. This procedure has not been demonstrated to be successful in a
valid test (ref. 6), nor to remove any of the first class stress which
involves long range relaxations or structural modifications. The
influence over the second class is still controversial.
Flame hardened
castings should be stress relieved to minimize distortion or cracking
and for
increasing the
toughness of the hardened layer. At 300 to
400°
F after 6 to 8
hours, 15-25% of the stresses can be relieved while reducing the surface
hardness with 2 to 6 HRC depending on the alloying elements content
(fig. 2, ref. 1). At higher temperatures (800 to 11 OO°F) up to 90% of
the stress can be relieved while the surface hardness may decrease with
6 to 12 HRC (fig. 3, ref. 1).
Cast irons can be
chrome plated if the surface is capable of conducting the required
current and is free of large voids, pits, gross inclusions and massive
segregation. Also, the surface must be free from macro-stress or surface
stress induced during hardening, grinding, stoning and polishing, which
may result in microcracks after plating.
Large and intricated
castings with a hardness of over 40 HRC should be stress relieved before
plating at 300 to 450°F. To ameliorate the effects of hydrogen
embrittlement these parts should be baked at 350-450°F for 3-4 hours,
immediately after plating (see ref. 7 and Federal Specification
QQ-C-320, Amendment 1).
As an alternative to
chrome plating, IONITRIDING®, a clean and pollution free process, is
often used effectively because of its specific advantages and cost
effectiveness:
-
increases impact
load and sliding wear resistance at once with the uniformity of the
hardness distribution over the entire surface of the processed die
-
improves fatigue
resistance against cracks initiation into the surface due to
compressed stresses
~ developed
-
deeper case depths:
0.008 to 0.012" diffusion zone plus 0.0004 to 0.001" extra hard
epsilon layer (indicated for sliding wear applications)
-
advanced stress
relieving (75 to 85% and vacuum outgassing after casting, grinding,
welding repairs and flame hardening, in the same process
-
because the layer is
diffusion based, it will not flake or peel and it has low friction
(typically 0.10
against steel), good
antigauling and antiscoring properties due to the ceramic nature of
the nitrides
-
after service or if
emergency repairs are needed, the damaged spots can be successfully
welded "in house" many times (the whole cast is stress relieved) and
without the need to immediately reprocess the whole die.
The decision in choosing
a process or a combination of processes which should be used to meet the
requirements of a specific application is an analysis of the given
existing circumstances, examination of use requirements for the parts,
and any outside factors (time availability, costs, production volumes,
equipment tolerances,.. .).
REFERENCES
1. B. Kovacs, Heat
Treating of Gray Irons, ASM Handbook, Vol. 4, 1991, p. 671-692.
2. E. Dorazil, B.
Barta, E. Munsterova, L. Stransky, A. Huvar, High Strength Bainitic
Ductile Iron, Int. Cast. Met. J., June 1982, p. 52-62
3. Y.H. Lee and R.C.
Voight, The Hardenability of Ductile Irons, Trans. AFS, Vol. 97, 1989,
p. 915-938
4. U.H. Gommann, Gas
Nitriding: Choosing Metals For Success, Heat Treating, March 1991, p.
22-23 5. A.K. Sinha, Defects and Distortion in Heat-Treated Parts, ASM
Handbook, Vol. 4, 1991, p. 603 6. C.F. Walton, Introduction to Heat
Treating of Cast Irons, ASM Handbook, Vol. 4, 1991, p. 669 7. ASM
Committee, Hard Chromium Plating, Metals Handbook, Vol. 2,1964, p.
462-474
* George Idriceanu,
Director of Research and Development, and Process Engineering, Sun Steel
Treating Inc.
|